It is said periodisation is dead in the world of athletics. My question would be how so? During my courses and study in Australia, we were taught about the periodisation style of Matveyev and popularised by Tudor Bompa. Critics of periodisation sight these gentlemen with arguments that sports do not have one peak. This maybe a valid argument, Bompa counters that the model of periodisation is not about biomotor abilities but a concept to develop the athlete to be in the best performance shape (these are my words not Bompas) Periodisation is, basically, planning, with the result being the athlete is in shape to perform. As a former thrower, I found I could perform at a reasonably high level of my personal best 3 or 4 times a year. As a coach, I take this approach into my planning with an expectation that my sprinters can perform at personal best levels 2 or 3 times a year and my middle distance athletes 2 times a year. Considering the athletic season in Aus...
Comments
Post a Comment